Attention and Prediction in Cognitive Neuroscience
General Information
Estimated learning time
Recommendations
Competences / Learning outcomes
Learning objectives
Teaching blocks
Teaching methods and general organization
Official assessment of learning outcomes
Reading and study resources
General Information
Course unit name | Attention and Prediction in Cognitive Neuroscience |
Course unit code | 573616 |
Academic year | 2024/2025 |
Coordinator | Iria San Miguel Insua |
Department | Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology |
Credits | 2.5 |
Single program | S |
Estimated learning time
Activities | Type of training | Hours | Observations |
---|---|---|---|
Face-to-face and/or online activities | 25 | ||
- Lecture with practical component | Face-to-face | 7.5 | |
- Group tutorial | Face-to-face | 7 | |
- Student presentation and discussion | Face-to-face | 10.5 | |
Supervised project | 20 | ||
Independent learning | 17.5 |
Recommendations
Competences / Learning outcomes to be gained during study
- BASIC
Knowledge forming the basis of original thinking in the development or application of ideas, typically in a research context.
Capacity to apply the acquired knowledge to problem-solving in new or relatively unknown environments within broader (or multidisciplinary) contexts related to the field of study.
Capacity to integrate knowledge and tackle the complexity of formulating judgments based on incomplete or limited information, taking due consideration of the social and ethical responsibilities involved in applying knowledge and making judgments.
Capacity to communicate conclusions, judgments and the grounds on which they have been reached to specialist and non-specialist audiences in a clear and unambiguous manner.
Skills to enable lifelong self-directed and independent learning.
GENERAL
Capacity to speak in public.
Interpersonal skills and capacity to build professional relationships.
Capacity to use information and communication technologies for different purposes (communicating with other professionals, acquiring information, disseminating knowledge, etc.).
SPECIFIC
Capacity to identify and apply different data analysis techniques in behaviour and cognition.
Skills in evaluating scientific research in behaviour and cognition.
Capacity to use style guides to write scientific papers and books on different subjects related to research in behaviour and cognition, particularly APA Style, and know the steps required to publish such papers or books.
Teaching blocks
1 Prediction
2 Attention
3 Prediction and attention mix-up
Teaching methods and general organization
The contents of the course are presented through a combination of theoretical lectures by the teacher, journal club presentations from the students on scientific articles related to the course contents, and exercises in small groups. The timetable for the activities and required readings and the deadlines for the submission of exercises is published on the Virtual Campus.
Official assessment of learning outcomes
Assessment of the learning outcomes is based on the following three activities:
Journal club presentation (30% of the final grade, compulsory): each student gives a short individual presentation on a research article. Students receive feedback from the lecturer and the other students to improve their presentation. The improved version must be submitted as a video and is graded by the teacher following the assessment rubric shared via the Virtual Campus.
Group work in class (10% of the final grade, compulsory): during class sessions, students work in small groups on solving small exercises and performing peer assessment of the journal club presentations.
Final exam (60% of the final grade, compulsory): individual written examination with open-answer questions covering the contents of the fundamental bibliography, the lectures, and the journal club presentations and discussions. It takes place on the last session of the course.
A minimum final grade of 5 is required to pass the subject. A minimum mark of 5 (out of 10) in the final exam is required so that the other marks may be incorporated in calculating the final grade. Participation is required in at least 80% of the group activities to pass the subject.
Students who fail the final exam are eligible to repeat assessment through another examination with the same characteristics, worth a maximum of 60% of the final grade. The marks obtained in the journal club presentation and in the group work are kept, and the weighted sum is added to the mark obtained in the repeat assessment exam to calculate the final grade. Students with a grade of Absent are not eligible for repeat assessment.
Final grades are rated as follows: Absent, Pass (>= 5), Merit (>= 7.5), Excellent (>= 9). The Excellent with honours distinction is assigned to 5% of students who obtain the highest grades, as long as they have obtained a final grade of Excellent.
Reading and study resources
1. Prediction
Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I. & Schröger, E. (2012). Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 120-131.
Heilbron, M., & Chait, M. (2017). Great expectations: Is there evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex? Neuroscience.
2. Attention
Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474-480.
Schroeder, C. E., Wilson, D. A., Radman, T., Scharfman, H., & Lakatos, P. (2010). Dynamics of Active Sensing and perceptual selection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 172–6.
Meehan TP, Bressler SL (2012). Neurocognitive networks: findings, models, and theory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36(10):2232-47.
3. Prediction and attention mixup
Schröger, E., Marzecová, A., & SanMiguel, I. (2015). Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 41(5), 641–64.
Summerfield, C., Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 403–9.