Duration: 2014 - 2017
Code: FFI2013-47948-P
In the 1960s and 1970s Castañeda, Perry and Lewis argued that, among de re or singular thoughts, thoughts about oneself “as oneself” – de se thoughts – raise special issues. Perry and Lewis offered contrasting accounts: while Lewis aims to account for de se thoughts by taking the subject away from de se contents, which are thus properties instead of complete traditional propositions, Perry offers an account compatible with traditional views. This issue has recently become a hot topic of debate, on different counts. First, there is a debate whether natural languages include expressions specifically devoted to the ascription of de se thoughts. Second, some recent proposals to relativize truth appeal to de se contents, understood along the lines that Lewis' suggested. Third, there have been proposals to characterize in such terms the content of conscious perceptual experiences and related matters, such as the primary/secondary quality distinction. This project aims at clarifying the nature of first-personal thoughts, investigating in particular whether the Lewisian view is required to account for the indicated phenomena, or a Perrian view could properly account for them. The project aims to investigate also whether an account of de se thoughts should be able to explain epistemological aspects of subjectivity such as the phenomenon of Immunity to Error through Misidentification, and, if so, how the Lewisian and Perrian accounts fare in that respect. Similarly, the project aims to investigate whether an account of de se thoughts presupposes an account of self-knowledge – the apparently privileged knowledge we have of our own states – and, if so, once again to compare how the Lewisian and Perrian accounts fare in that respect. Finally, we want to explore the relevance of accounts of de se thoughts for issues concerning the metaphysics of persons.
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2018
De Se Thoughts and Immunity to Error through Misidentification
Synthese 195, 3311-3333, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0817-y.
Ivan Milić, Javier González de Prado Salas. 2018
Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (2): 1-27
Ivan Milić, Stefan Reining . 2017
A Wittgensteinian Role-Based Account of Assertion
Philosophical Investigations 40 (2): 139-153
Ivan Milić. 2017
Philosophical Studies 174 (9): 2277-2295
Marta Campdelacreu. 2016
Crítica 2016, pp. 77-92
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2016
Notre Dame Philosophical Review
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2016
García-Carpintero, M. & Torre, S. (eds.), About Oneself, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 179-199.
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2016
Teorema 35(3), 5-20
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2016
Editorial Cátedra, Madrid
Marie Guillot. 2016
Review of Philosophy and Psychology. [Download PDF ]
Marie Guillot. 2016
Philosophical Explorations. Forthcoming.
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2015
Topoi, DOI: 10.1007/s11245-014-9264-5
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2015
Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1932, 2015, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01932.
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2015
Organon F 22, suppl. 1, 145-168.
Ivan Milić. 2015
A Note on Existentially Known Assertions
The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261): 813-821
Manuel García-Carpintero. 2014
Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 53, 136, suppl. vol. (2014), 119-124.
Marie Guillot. 2014
Identification-Free at Last. Semantic Relativism, Evans's Legacy and a Unified Approach to Immunity to Error through Misidentification
Marie Guillot, joint work with Alexandre Billon. 2014
In Juan Diego Moya Bedoya and David Suárez-Rivero (eds), Gottlob Frege’s Puzzle. A Reexamination of the Cognitive Significance Phenomenon. Rev. Filosofía Univ. Costa Rica. 53 (136 Extraordinary), 9-15, May-August 2014, p. 97-105. [Download PDF ]