Adèle

MERCIER

 

PhD (Philosophy) UCLA 1992, MA (Philosophy) UCLA 1983.

C.Phil (Linguistics) UCLA 1990, MA (Linguistics) UCLA 1988.

Professor of  Philosophy (cross-appointed to Linguistics),

Queen=s University in Kingston, Canada since 1992.

Visiting Professor, University of Barcelona, LOGOS:

Logic, Language and Cognition Research Group, 2002-03.

Visiting Professor/Scholar (seasonal) at UCLA:

Dept of Linguistics 1995-99, Dept of Philosophy 1992-97.

Research Affiliate at (the former) CREA: Centre de Recherche en

Epistémologie Appliquée, Paris, 1991-93.

Post-Doc at Stanford University,  CSLI: Center for Study of

Language and Information, 1992-93.

 

Photo Shaun Maxwell, Barcelona 2002

 

 

INTERESTS

 

My work is informed by theoretical linguistics, specifically by the approach to the study of language developed by Chomsky. I engage influential views in philosophy of language and mind and argue that some fail to satisfy criteria of adequacy required of sustainable conceptions of the relation between speakers and their language. Though critical of much current philosophical externalism (especially that concerning the relationship between the content of our minds and our connection to a linguistic community), I also engage influential views in linguistics and argue that some fail to appreciate important lessons drawn from externalist considerations of the last half century. My work is informed also by logic and by formal semantics (broadly speaking, Montague Grammar), as well as by natural language semantics. In applying philosophy of language to current social and political issues, this work tends to have a deontic component which I greatly value. I am currently at work on a book about what a language is (if there is such a thing) and what makes linguistic sense (if anything) in the notion of a linguistic community.

 

 

SELECTED WRITINGS

 

1998: On Communication-Based De Re Thought, Commitments De Dicto, and Word-Individuation.

Philosophy and Linguistics (ed. R. Stainton), Westview Press (37 ms. pages).

1996: A Perverse Case of the Contingent A Priori: On the Logic of Emasculating Language (A Reply to Dawkins and

 Dummett). Philosophical Topics (special ed. S. Haslanger), Arkansas University Press (52 ms. pages).

1994: Consumerism and Language Acquisition.

Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol.17, No 5 (29 ms pages)

1993: Normativism and the Mental: A Problem of Language Individuation.

Philosophical Studies, Vol.72, No 1 (25 ms pages)

 

 

CURRICULUM VITAE    ....rtf

 

CONTACT ME:                    merciera@post.queensu.ca

 

ONLINE PAPERS

 

2003: Conventions, Convergence and the Metaphysics of Words: It's Shirt-Buttoning All the Way Down, Ruth! (23 ms. pages).

 

Keywords:             convention, convergence, word-individuation, Millikan

 

2003: Analyticity, Intentionality and Necessity: The Case about Gay Marriage (39 ms. pages)

Emerged from my role as expert witness for the petitioners in Egale v. Canada (2001) and in Halpern v. Canada (2001). Analyzes and rejects a suggestion that marriage analytically involves a male and a female and hence of necessity excludes gays and lesbians. In so doing, draws attention to important differences between natural kind terms and social kind terms, and to the differing role of experts in each case.

 

Keywords:             analyticity, intentionality, necessity, same-sex marriage, Egale v. Canada (AG),

Halpern v. Canada(AG), natural kinds, social kinds, experts

 

2003: What is a Word? (26 ms. pages)

 

Keywords:             word, word-individuation, word-type, Kaplan, common currency, semantic shift

 

2001: Expert witness for petitioners in Halpern v. Canada(A.G.) on the meaning of the word >marriage=:

Filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court files 684/00, 30/2001), November (31 pages).

Replies to an affidavit by Rob Stainton in which he argues that because of the pre-legal Judeo-Christian history of marriage, the meaning of >marriage= for Canadians analytically excludes reference to same-sex unions, as >marriage= Ajust is@ heterosexual, hence for gays to petition the Courts for the right to marry is an unintelligible as for Atwo brothers to petition the Courts for the right to be called sisters@. Also replies to Stainton=s foisting a disreputable Whorfian interpretation upon Erhlich=s suggestion that denying gays access to a fundamental institution such as marriage is harmful to them in a context of homophobia.

 

Keywords:             same-sex marriage, reference, Egale v. Canada(AG), Halpern v. Canada(AG), Stainton, Erhlich

 

2002: L'homme et la factrice: Sur la logique du genre.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, VOL. XLI, No. 3 (45 ms. pages).

Applies the logical lessons of A Perverse Case of the Contingent A Priori: On the Logic of Emasculating Language (A Reply to Dawkins and Dummett) (1996) to the study of grammatical and semantic gender in French, where the relevant problems and recommended solutions are (surprisingly) different.

 

Keywords:             homme, genre syntaxique, genre semantique, masculin, feminin

 

1999:  Dogmatic Scepticism, Cynicism, and the There-Is-No-Such-Thing-As-Truth Syndrome.

SiteStreet, an on-line journal of art, criticism and ideas.    (6 ms. pages)

http://www.sidestreet.org/sitestreet_arch/issue_four/mercier/

 

Keywords:             truth, post-modernism, scepticism, cynicism, moral absolutism, relativism

 

1998: On Communication-Based De Re Thought, Commitments De Dicto, and Word-Individuation.

Philosophy and Linguistics (ed. R. Stainton), Westview Press (37 ms. pages).

Provides an account of how necessary subjective syntactic investments on the part of speakers affect the semantic contents of their words and the possibilities for their thought-contents.

 

Keywords:             de re, communication, de dicto, word-individuation, thought, subjectivism

 

1996: A Perverse Case of the Contingent A Priori: On the Logic of Emasculating Language (A Reply to Dawkins and Dummett). Philosophical Topics (special ed. S. Haslanger), Arkansas University Press (52 ms. pages).

Scrutinizes in logical and semantic detail what exactly is wrong with masculine language serving double duty as sex-neutral language (>man= standing for humans, >he= standing for anyone, and so on).

 

Keywords:             contingent a priori, masculine, sex-neutral, man, he, gender, Dawkins, Dummett

 

1994: Consumerism and Language Acquisition.

Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol.17, No 5  (29 ms. pages).

Argues that one sort of view currently dominant in philosophy of mind (e.g. Kaplan=s Consumerism) makes it hard to explain how speakers learn to speak. 

 

Keywords:             consumerism, language, acquisition, Kaplan, subjectivism

 

1993: Normativism and the Mental: A Problem of Language Individuation.

Philosophical Studies, Vol.72, No 1  (25 ms. pages).

Argues that one sort of view currently dominant in philosophy of mind (e.g. Burge=s externalism) makes it hard to account for the ineluctible fact of language change over time.

 

Keywords:             normativism, externalism, mental, language, individuation, Burge, semantic shift

 

1988: On Rule Ordering Paradoxes in Morphology: A Semantic Alternative to the Level Ordering Hypothesis.

MA thesis (Ling.), UCLA University Archives (70 pages).

 

Keywords:             bracketing paradoxes, rule-ordering, Pezetsky, semantics, morphology