19 March 2014 | 15:00 | Seminari de Filosofia UB
Parsimony arguments are advanced in both science and philosophy. How are they related? In this talk, I will describe the justifications that attach to two types of parsimony argument in science. In the first, parsimony is a surrogate for likelihood. In the second, parsimony is relevant to estimating how accurately a model will predict new data when fitted to old. I then will consider how these two justifications apply to some parsimony arguments that have been made in philosophy.
(This talk will be presenting some ideas from chapter 5 of Eliot Sober’s book Ockham's Razors -- A User's Manual (forthcoming)