Field Trips
Depositional Systems
-
-
✓Deepwater
-
-
Basins for field trips on deepwater subject are:
-
‣Ainsa basin and Jaca basin (Eocene)
-
‣Ripoll basin (Eocene)
-
‣Areny basin (Upper Cretaceous)
-
‣Basque and Cantabrian basins (Cretaceous-Oligocene)
-
-
GGAC has a vast deepwater dataset including:
-
‣Outcrop characterizations, and related tabulated data
-
‣Geophysical data (synthetic/real, surface and subsurface)
-
‣3-D hierarchical geocellular structure and facies models (basin-scale to bed-scale)
-
‣Flow-simulated upscaled models
-
-
Topics that can be covered are:
-
‣Transport and sedimentation processes
-
‣Methods of architectural and stratigraphic analysis
-
‣Mass-transport deposits, origin and effects on reservoir distribution
-
‣Role of folding and faulting on turbidite sandstone distribution
-
‣From source to sink, contrasting continental and shallow-marine to deepwater terrigenous stratigraphy
-
-
-
Examples of summary contents for some field trips on deepwater subject
-
1. Turbidite elements of the Ainsa and Jaca basins (Eocene, southern Pyrenees)
-
-
The Ainsa and Jaca basins represent slope and base-of slope depositional settings, in a foredeep to piggy-back evolving basin context. The basin-fill is 4 km thick and can be subdivided as four major depositional cycles, bounded by kilometre- scaled mass-wasting truncation surfaces. Major cycle boundaries represent slope destruction episodes and thrust-driven basin reorganization. Each major cycle is made up of several turbidite systems (80-800 m thick), in turn made up of: stacked channel, overbank, and lobe elements plus a variety of mass-transport deposits. Outcrops allow for:
-
‣Comprehensive inspection of the transverse cross-sectional architecture of turbidite-channels and detailed correlation (bed by bed to package scale) of channel to overbank and mass-transport deposits in a direction perpendicular to paleoflow. Leading to complete understanding of the genetics and depositional heterogeneity of a variety of channel-fills elements (erosional, mixed, depositional).
-
‣3D-Stacking patterns of channel-fills, to be discussed in terms of growing-anticline topography. Gamma-Ray profiles and synthetic seismics are available for a discussion about resolution in seismics and scales of heterogeneity.
-
‣Mass-transport complexes vs. turbidite sandstone distribution
-
‣Detailed inspection of partial cross-sectional architecture of lobe elements
-
‣Facies trends across the slope and into the base-of-slope at the scale of individual turbidite systems (N/G, thickness, facies proportion )
-
‣Deepwater Ichnology. Several ichnospecies are present, some bear significant predictive implications, all are integrated in architectural analysis.
-
‣The contents of this trip are generally organized to be suitable for both exploration geologists/geophysicists, facies modelers, and reservoir engineers.
-
-
2. South-Pyrenean Mass-transport deposits
-
-
Mass-transport deposits (MTD' s) represent a significant volume in many slope and base-of-slope settings. In general, the processes and products related to mass-transport tend to diminish petroleum potential, either by erosion/resedimentation or by substraction of accommodation space. However, some MTD' s can be reservoirs, and others indicate bypass and sand-accumulation.
-
They can also relate to sequence boundaries. Understanding MTD' s is therefore relevant for the exploration geologist/geophysicist. South-Pyrenean MTD' s range from Upper-Cretaceous to Oligocene and occurred in different portions of foreland basins. Some are proven gas reservoirs. They can be terrigenous, carbonate, or mixed. They exhibit a variety of structures, from extensional and contractional slides and slumps to debris-flows.
-