Ioanna Anna Papachristou and Martí Rosas-Casals
Subjective
well-being (SWB) studies have been at the centre of researchers’ attention
during the last years. With the majority of people now living in cities, the
necessity of a more anthropocentric approach for the study and betterment of
urban environments is constantly increasing. In this sense, defining and
measuring SWB in urban contexts can be of particular benefit in urban design
and planning processes. In this article, a method for measuring SWB for urban
places based on the accomplishment of the fundamental human needs is presented
and applied at the neighbourhood of Vila de Grŕcia, Barcelona.
For the measurement, a survey was constructed based on the specific geographical and socio-economic characteristics of the study case. Retrieved from Max-Neef’s Human Scale Development Paradigm (Max-Neef, Elizalde, and Hopenhayn 1991), human needs correspond to the domains of study of the suggested method. The matching of the survey’s questions to each need is the outcome of two consecutive processes: a first qualitative one, involving the work of an expert group, and a second quantitative one, involving the definition of weights among the questions that affect the same need.
Although the final result is positive for this study case, results for each need show considerable differences in their level of accomplishment. At the same time people seem to truly believe that most of their feelings are affected by their living environment, with stress and calmness leading the list. In summary, the method defines a simple tool to quantify and evaluate current levels of SWB at different urban scales and to define more holistic urban indexes in order to improve decision making processes, policies and plans. The classification of the questions per need favours the identification of a potential problem at the urban grid and consequently can be used as a process for implementing related measures of improvement.
The method can also be seen as a tool to enhance bottom-up approaches and processes of urban analysis with the aim to create more livable places for the local population
For the measurement, a survey was constructed based on the specific geographical and socio-economic characteristics of the study case. Retrieved from Max-Neef’s Human Scale Development Paradigm (Max-Neef, Elizalde, and Hopenhayn 1991), human needs correspond to the domains of study of the suggested method. The matching of the survey’s questions to each need is the outcome of two consecutive processes: a first qualitative one, involving the work of an expert group, and a second quantitative one, involving the definition of weights among the questions that affect the same need.
Although the final result is positive for this study case, results for each need show considerable differences in their level of accomplishment. At the same time people seem to truly believe that most of their feelings are affected by their living environment, with stress and calmness leading the list. In summary, the method defines a simple tool to quantify and evaluate current levels of SWB at different urban scales and to define more holistic urban indexes in order to improve decision making processes, policies and plans. The classification of the questions per need favours the identification of a potential problem at the urban grid and consequently can be used as a process for implementing related measures of improvement.
The method can also be seen as a tool to enhance bottom-up approaches and processes of urban analysis with the aim to create more livable places for the local population
<<